/* ── The Method · Deep-dive sections: VISDI · The Ledger · CLV ── Content sourced from Minerva_VISDI_Ledger_CLV_Explained.pptx. Consumes shared globals: Eyebrow, Icon. Exposes window.MethodDeepDive. */ const VISDI_SKY = "#3FB1E5"; const LEDGER_GREEN = "#069348"; const CLV_GOLD = "#8E86C8"; /* ---------- small shared building blocks ---------- */ function DDHead({ eyebrow, accent, title, lead, mb = 52, leadMaxWidth = 680 }) { return (
{lead}
}{desc}
{body}
{deliver &&{deliver}
Minerva connects people, systems, processes, and operational knowledge into governed digital environments.
Not every action needs the same review. The Ledger grades each activity to its risk and routes it to the right validation layer. A generic log records events; the Ledger records events and enforces who may approve them, and at what level of scrutiny.
Result: the Ledger produces the validation evidence an auditor expects to find - not as a retrospective effort, but as a natural product of how work is done.
Human-in-command roles
{lead}
}{p.lead}
}{p.lead}
}Every AI system produces output based on its context - the instructions, documents, tools, and parameters it is given. If that context drifts, degrades, or contains inconsistent language, the system's output degrades with it, silently, in ways that may not be visible until an audit.
CLV is the discipline Minerva built to govern the context layer itself - one layer upstream of the software validation you already do. Where Computer System Validation (CSV) asks "does the system behave as specified?", CLV asks "is what the system is being given still accurate, consistent, and trustworthy?"
Context behaves like an SOP you change every day. CLV is the framework that keeps it in a validated state as it evolves.